Editorial policy
This site exists to be the most accurate public resource on selling and buying AI training data. These are the rules we write by.
Key takeaways
- Every figure names its source in the sentence and in the page's source list, and we prefer primary sources.
- Buyer profiles, including our competitors, are written from each company's own published pages and dated. Missing facts say "Not published".
- We correct factual errors promptly and note material corrections on the page.
Sources
- Every figure names its source in the sentence and in the source list.
- We prefer primary sources: a buyer's own terms page, a regulator's guidance, a court filing, a law firm's published analysis.
- Where a figure comes from a secondary source, we say so.
- We do not publish testimonials, case studies or statistics we cannot verify.
Buyer profiles
Profiles of buyers, marketplaces and brokers, including our competitors, are written from each company's own published pages and dated. Where a company does not publish a fact, we write "Not published" rather than guess. A listing is not an endorsement.
Review and updates
Each page shows the date it was last reviewed. Prices and terms in this market change quickly, so we review buyer profiles and pricing guides most often.
Corrections
If you spot an error, email hello@sellmydatatoai.net with the page and a source. We correct factual errors promptly and note material corrections on the page.
Not legal advice
We are a broker, not a law firm. We tell you what buyers will check and help you prepare, but you should take independent legal advice before signing any license.
For data owners
Ready to see what buyers will offer?
Book a consultation and we will scope your data, explain our fee in writing and set out the steps to competing offers from vetted buyers.
For AI teams
Ready to source?
Book a consultation to brief us. We shortlist vetted sellers, each with a vetting file covering rights evidence, provenance and a representative sample.