Skip to content
Sell My Data To AI

Selling data

Telling staff and clients about a data license

By Gareth HoyleLast updated 8 minute readHow we research

In short

Tell staff and clients about a data license before the data leaves the company, not after. FTC staff warn that quiet, retroactive privacy policy changes may be deceptive, and the CCPA requires notice before personal information is used for incompatible new purposes. Settle what is included and excluded first, then tell each group in a planned order so nobody learns about the deal from the press.

Key takeaways

  • FTC staff say adopting more permissive data practices through a surreptitious, retroactive policy change may be unfair or deceptive.
  • The CCPA covers California employees and bars using personal information for incompatible new purposes without notice. A sale also brings a right to opt out.
  • In the US, staff messages may be protected concerted activity under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, and union agreements may restrict a sale.
  • Most clients need to hear that their material is excluded, and the manifest should prove it.
  • You can keep the buyer and price confidential. You cannot keep the processing itself from the people whose personal data is in it.

"Will my staff or clients find out?" is one of the first questions sellers ask. The better question is what they should hear, from whom and when, because the people in your records are also the people most likely to object.

This guide sets out what US rules say about telling people, which groups need to hear what, and a practical order for the announcement, with a short section on UK and EU duties. It describes the law and published cases. It is not legal advice for your company, so take independent advice on your own notices and contracts.

Do you have to tell staff and clients about a data license?

You often have to tell staff and clients about a data license where it involves their personal data, and you usually should even where it does not. The legal duty attaches to personal data, while the commercial duty attaches to anyone whose confidential information or work is in the archive.

Who needs to hear about a data license
GroupWhy they are affectedWhat usually appliesWhat they need to hear
EmployeesTheir emails, chat, code and ticketsNLRA Section 7, any union agreement and the CCPA for California staffWhat is included and excluded, how it is de-identified and how to opt out or object
Former employeesTheir messages remain in the archiveThe privacy notices that applied when their data was collectedUpdated privacy information where you can reach them
ClientsTheir confidential information and deliverablesContract confidentiality clauses, and CCPA service provider terms for data you process for themUsually that their material is excluded
Customers and usersTheir personal data in tickets, CRM records and callsYour privacy notice, the CCPA and FTC guidanceUpdated privacy information and any opt-out route
UnionsMembers' communicationsThe collective bargaining agreementConsultation before signing
Board and investorsAuthority and consent rightsArticles and shareholder agreementsThe terms, for approval

What do US rules require you to tell people?

US rules focus on the promises you made when you collected the data. FTC staff wrote on February 13, 2024 that "a business that collects user data based on one set of privacy commitments cannot then unilaterally renege on those commitments after collecting users' data".

The FTC post cites its 2004 case against Gateway Learning, which changed its privacy policy to share consumer data with third parties without telling consumers, and a 2023 case against a genetic testing company over a retroactive expansion of the third parties it could share data with. Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz adds that companies must comply with the privacy statements in effect when the data was collected.

The CCPA adds specific duties for California residents, including employees and job applicants. Section 1798.100 bars a business from using personal information for additional purposes incompatible with those it disclosed at collection without giving notice, and section 1798.120 requires a business that sells personal information to tell consumers and let them opt out. The California Attorney General notes that the exemptions for employment-related information expired on December 31, 2022.

The practical effect is that a new notice rarely fixes old data. Compare each source against the notice in force when it was collected. Where the notice does not cover licensing, exclude the personal data or de-identify it, and remember that the CCPA treats a transfer of personal information for value as a sale unless it meets its de-identification standard, according to Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz. Our guide to CCPA, state privacy laws and GDPR covers the other states.

Should you tell employees before or after signing?

You should tell employees before signing, once the scope is settled but before any data leaves. The CCPA's notice duty applies before personal information is put to a new use, and the order can matter for labor law as well as goodwill.

Daniel Goldberg of Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz notes that employee communications "may be protected concerted activity under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act", and that where staff are unionized, "the collective bargaining agreement may restrict the sale, and the company may have bargaining obligations". He also observes that most employee notices and handbooks do not contemplate selling workplace communications for AI training.

Staff objections are not hypothetical. In the Spirit Airlines bankruptcy, flight attendants' unions objected to the sale of the airline's data, and the pilots' union argued that some safety records should stay confidential even after de-identification, Fortune reported in September 2026.

What should you tell clients about a data license?

You should tell clients what you are excluding, and for most sellers that is all of their material. Buyers expect it: Polyshares says its license does not cover data a company holds on behalf of its own clients, and Endless Data says it never licenses client books or privileged client matter content.

If client material is in scope, such as de-identified deliverables, check each contract and get written consent where the contract is unclear. Where you process a client's personal information as its CCPA service provider, California Civil Code section 1798.140(ag) requires your contract to bar you from selling it or using it outside the business purposes the contract specifies. Contract restrictions are one of the eight checks in our seller vetting standard.

Professional firms carry extra confidentiality duties to clients. Our pages for law firms and marketing agencies cover the client issues that come up most in each.

What do public data deals show about disclosure?

Public data deals show that the way people learn about a license shapes their reaction as much as the terms do. These cases involve publishers and platforms rather than company records, but the people affected reacted in similar ways.

Published cases and what they show
CaseWhat was reportedWhat it shows
Stack Overflow and OpenAI, May 2024Some users overwrote their answers in protest and had accounts suspended (The Register)Contributors who feel unasked will act
Wiley, August 2024$44 million expected from AI rights deals, with no opt-out for authors (The Bookseller)A no-opt-out position became the headline
HarperCollins, November 2024Author opt-in, $5,000 per title split equally, three-year term (Publishers Weekly)Even opt-in terms drew questions about who the buyer was
Spirit Airlines, September 2026Unions and consumer privacy advocates objected to the data sale (Fortune)Staff object even when records are de-identified

The HarperCollins case is worth reading closely. Publishers Weekly reported that Robert Gottlieb of Trident Media said most of his authors were uneasy mainly because they did not know who the buyer was. Saying what kind of buyer will receive the data, and what it may do, answers much of that concern without naming the company.

Can you keep a data license confidential?

You can keep a data license's commercial terms confidential, including the buyer's name and the price, but not the processing itself from the people whose personal data is in it. Those are separate duties.

Several buyers offer confidentiality on the commercial side. Troveo says a seller's company is never named publicly and that buyers are introduced confidentially only after an agreement is signed. Polyshares keeps company names confidential on its track record page and does not disclose which labs take which data. With us, buyers see only redacted samples under a mutual NDA before a license is signed.

If you hold UK or EU data

UK GDPR requires you to tell people about a new purpose before you start processing their data for it. Article 13(3) covers data collected from the person and Article 14(4) covers data obtained from elsewhere, such as client contacts named in your email. Both say the controller must provide information on that other purpose "prior to that further processing".

The ICO's guidance on the right to be informed says: "You must bring any new uses of an individual's personal data to their attention before you start the processing." The ICO also treats anonymization as processing of personal data in its own right, so preparing records for a license is itself covered.

The information must include the right to object. Under Article 21(1), where processing rests on legitimate interests, a person can object on grounds relating to their particular situation, and the controller must stop unless it shows compelling legitimate grounds. Where you process a client's data as its processor, Article 28(10) treats a processor that sets its own purposes as a controller for that processing.

How do you plan the announcement?

You plan the announcement by fixing the scope first and the message second, then telling each group in order of how directly they are affected.

  1. 1

    Settle scope and exclusions

    Decide which systems, date ranges and record types are in, and record what is out, such as HR files, private messages, health data and client material.

  2. 2

    Check what people were told

    Collect the privacy notices, employee handbooks and client contracts in force when the data was collected, and note any gaps.

  3. 3

    Get internal approvals

    Brief the board and investors with consent rights, and open consultation with any union whose agreement may apply.

  4. 4

    Update privacy information

    Publish updated privacy information before any processing for the license begins, including how to opt out or object.

  5. 5

    Tell employees directly

    Explain the license in a meeting or message from a senior leader, with written answers to common questions and a named contact.

  6. 6

    Write to affected clients

    Confirm that their material is excluded, or ask for written consent where it is not.

  7. 7

    Prepare a public line and keep records

    Agree a short statement in case the deal becomes public, and keep a record of who was told what and when.

What should the message to staff say?

The message to staff should say plainly what is being licensed, what is not and what protections apply. Staff will read it as a test of whether the company has thought about them.

  • Why the company is licensing the data, in one or two sentences
  • Which systems and years are included
  • What is excluded, such as HR files, payroll, health information and direct messages if you leave them out
  • How names and other identifiers are removed, and how the method was tested
  • What kind of buyer will receive the data and what the license lets it do
  • How to ask questions or object, and by when
  • Whether staff share in the proceeds, stated honestly either way

Our guide to whether selling company data to AI is safe covers the wider risks, and the de-identification guide explains how to show staff their names have been removed. To plan a license with disclosure built in, book a free consultation.

Frequently asked questions

Do I need employee consent to license their emails for AI training?
Not always. The CCPA relies on notice and an opt-out for a sale rather than consent, but it requires notice before personal information is used for incompatible new purposes. Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act and any union agreement may also apply. In the UK, consent is only one lawful basis, and staff can object under Article 21. Take independent advice on your position.
Do former employees need to be told about a data license?
The privacy promises you made still apply to former employees' data, and FTC staff warn against changing those promises retroactively. UK GDPR transparency duties also apply whether or not the person still works for you. In practice, many sellers exclude or de-identify former staff records and update the privacy information on their website. Where former employees are easy to reach, telling them directly avoids surprises. Take advice on what your notices require.
Will the buyer be named publicly?
Not usually, unless you agree to it. Troveo says a seller's company is never named publicly, and Polyshares keeps company names confidential. Large publisher deals are often announced, but private company licenses rarely are. You can tell staff what kind of buyer will receive the data and what it may do without naming the company.
What if an employee objects to the license?
Take the objection seriously and respond in writing. A California employee can opt out of the sale of their personal information under section 1798.120 of the CCPA, and UK GDPR Article 21 gives staff in the UK a right to object where you rely on legitimate interests. The simplest answer is often to exclude that person's messages from the package and record the exclusion in the manifest.
Should we tell clients even if none of their data is included?
Usually yes, for your largest clients at least. Client emails and documents sit in most company archives, and a client who hears about a license secondhand may assume the worst. A short letter confirming that their material is excluded, backed by the exclusions in your data manifest, costs little and protects the relationship.

Sources

  1. AI (and other) Companies: Quietly Changing Your Terms of Service Could Be Unfair or Deceptive, Federal Trade Commission, accessed November 2026
  2. California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), State of California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, accessed November 2026
  3. California Civil Code section 1798.100, California Legislative Information, accessed November 2026
  4. California Civil Code section 1798.120 (right to opt out of sale or sharing), California Legislative Information, accessed November 2026
  5. California Civil Code section 1798.140 (definitions), California Legislative Information, accessed November 2026
  6. UK GDPR Article 13, legislation.gov.uk, accessed November 2026
  7. UK GDPR Article 14, legislation.gov.uk, accessed November 2026
  8. UK GDPR Article 21, legislation.gov.uk, accessed November 2026
  9. UK GDPR Article 28, legislation.gov.uk, accessed November 2026
  10. The right to be informed, Information Commissioner's Office, accessed November 2026
  11. Introduction to anonymisation, Information Commissioner's Office, accessed November 2026
  12. Selling company data for AI training: what to know before you say yes, Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz, accessed November 2026
  13. Google wants Spirit Airlines' data. Micro1 wants to pay more, Fortune, accessed November 2026
  14. Polyshares homepage, Polyshares, accessed November 2026
  15. Track record, Polyshares, accessed November 2026
  16. Endless Data homepage and FAQ, Endless Data, accessed November 2026
  17. Business data, Troveo, accessed November 2026
  18. Stack Overflow simply bans folks who don't want their advice used to train AI, The Register, accessed November 2026
  19. Wiley set to earn $44m from AI rights deals, confirms 'no opt-out' for authors, The Bookseller, accessed November 2026
  20. Agents, authors question HarperCollins AI deal, Publishers Weekly, accessed November 2026

For data owners

Talk your situation through with us

Every archive has its own rights questions. In a free consultation we look at what you hold, which buyers fit, and what would need clearing before a sale.

Related guides