Sell call center data to AI companies
Last updated How we research
In short
Call centers and BPOs can license call recordings, transcripts, QA scorecards and agent knowledge bases to AI companies, and Mercor publishes a range of $20,000 to $250,000 per company. The first question is ownership: an outsourcer usually holds recordings as its clients' service provider. State recording consent laws, card codes and voiceprints also shape what you can sell.
Key takeaways
- AI buyers most want these records from call centers and bpos: (1) call recordings with transcripts, (2) chat and email transcripts and (3) QA scorecards linked to calls.
- Published buyer range for call centers and bpos: $20,000 to $250,000 per company.
- Source: Mercor's published referral listing for call centers, as reported by ddiy.co, checked November 2026.
- Size buyers look for: 50 to 5,000 agents (Mercor's listing).
- The first rights issue to clear: State all-party consent recording laws, such as California Penal Code section 632. This page covers 5 more.
- Sellers pay nothing to be assessed. We charge a success fee only when a deal completes, and the fee is agreed in writing before we introduce you to any buyer.
Call centers and BPOs: what buyers look for
- Records buyers ask for
- Call recordings with transcripts
- Chat and email transcripts
- QA scorecards linked to calls
- Agent scripts and knowledge base articles
- Escalation notes and disposition codes
- Calls in languages other than English
- Why buyers want them
- Voice agents and customer service models need real conversations with real outcomes. Recordings linked to QA scores and resolutions show what good and bad handling sounds like.
- Published buyer range
- $20,000 to $250,000 per companyMercor's published referral listing for call centers, as reported by ddiy.co, checked November 2026
- Size buyers look for
- 50 to 5,000 agents (Mercor's listing)
- Rights issues to clear
- State all-party consent recording laws, such as California Penal Code section 632
- BPOs hold client recordings as a CCPA service provider or, for health clients, a HIPAA business associate
- PCI DSS Requirement 3.3.1: no card validation codes in recordings
- Voiceprints under Illinois BIPA section 15(c)
- Recording notices written for quality and training, not for licensing to another company
- UK and EU: UK GDPR Articles 28 and 9 for calls handled for UK clients
Why call centers and bpos work with us
- 1
AI buyers publish ranges of $20,000 to $250,000 per company for call centers and bpos records. We tell you in one consultation where yours are likely to land.
- 2
Every buyer we introduce passes five checks, including company identity, intended use and security, before seeing even a redacted sample of your records.
- 3
You pay nothing unless a deal completes. Our success fee is agreed in writing before we introduce you to any buyer.
- 4
Your raw data never passes through us. You sign a license directly with your chosen buyer, after your own lawyer has reviewed it.
What call center data do AI companies buy?
AI companies buy call center data that pairs real conversations with what happened next. A recording on its own is useful. The same recording with a transcript, the QA score, the disposition code and whether the customer called back is far more useful.
- Call recordings with transcripts and speaker labels
- Chat and email transcripts from the same queues
- QA scorecards linked to the calls they assess
- Agent scripts, call flows and knowledge base articles
- Escalation notes, disposition codes and resolution outcomes
- Calls in languages other than English, which are scarcer
Buyers training voice agents want the audio. Buyers training text models may want transcripts only, which are easier to de-identify. See call recording data and speech and audio data for how each is used.
If your platform records the agent and the caller on separate channels, keep them separate in the export. Split channels make speaker labeling and redaction much easier. Record the codec, sample rate, queue and date range for each batch in your data manifest.
How much do AI companies pay for call center data?
AI companies publish a range of $20,000 to $250,000 for call center data. That is Mercor's referral listing for call centers of 50 to 5,000 agents, as reported by ddiy.co in October 2026.
The $250,000 ceiling is the lowest of the 11 Mercor listings ddiy.co reports. Call data is plentiful, so buyers pay more for linked outcomes, specialist queues such as technical support or claims handling, and languages that are hard to source. Transcripts from regulated queues, such as debt collection or insurance claims, need more careful redaction. A free data valuation tells you whether yours stands out.
Who owns the recordings: you or your clients?
The recordings usually belong to your clients if you are an outsourcer, and to you if you run an in-house contact center. This is the first question to settle, because it decides whether there is anything to sell.
A BPO handling calls for a client normally holds callers' personal information as the client's service provider. The CCPA, at California Civil Code section 1798.140(ag), defines a service provider by a contract that prohibits retaining, using or disclosing the personal information for any purpose other than the business purposes specified. On healthcare queues, a business associate may use or disclose protected health information only as its business associate contract permits, under 45 CFR 164.502(a)(3).
What an outsourcer usually owns outright is its own material: agent training content, QA frameworks, scripts it wrote, and internal operations data. In-house contact centers face a simpler question, because the company that took the calls usually controls the recordings, but the privacy notice and recording message in force at the time still apply. Read each outsourcing contract for any rights it gives you over de-identified or aggregated data.
Do recording consent laws affect a data sale?
Recording consent laws affect a data sale because they decide whether a recording was lawfully made in the first place. The federal Wiretap Act, at 18 U.S.C. section 2511(2)(d), allows a private party to intercept a call where one of the parties has given prior consent.
Some states go further. California Penal Code section 632 makes it an offense to record a confidential communication intentionally and without the consent of all parties, with a fine of up to $2,500 per violation for a first offense. Frankfurt Kurnit Klein and Selz notes that state call-recording consent laws apply in the US, and that companies must comply with the privacy statements in force when data was collected.
A message saying calls are recorded for quality and training purposes was written with your own staff in mind, and may not extend to licensing the recording to another company. The FTC warned in February 2024 that adopting more permissive data practices, such as AI training, through a quiet retroactive change may be unfair or deceptive. These points make de-identified transcripts and your own content the easier place to start, see de-identification for AI training data.
What must be removed from call recordings?
Card details, voiceprints and sensitive personal details must be removed from call recordings before any sale. Each is governed by its own rule.
| Content | Rule | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Card validation codes spoken on calls | PCI DSS Requirement 3.3.1 prohibits storing sensitive authentication data after authorization, including in audio | Confirm suppression was in place, exclude any calls where it was not |
| Card numbers and payment details | PCI DSS and the client's card brand obligations | Redact from audio and transcripts |
| Voiceprints from voice authentication | Illinois BIPA section 15(c) bars selling or profiting from biometric identifiers | Exclude |
| Health details on healthcare queues | HIPAA business associate limits | Exclude unless the client's agreement and advice allow it |
| Names, addresses, account numbers | Personal information under state privacy laws | Redact from audio and transcripts |
The PCI Security Standards Council's FAQ 1210 says storing card validation codes in any digital audio recording after authorization breaches Requirement 3.3.1. Under BIPA, which lists voiceprints as biometric identifiers, a negligent violation carries liquidated damages of $1,000 and an intentional or reckless one $5,000, per violation.
If you hold UK or EU data
Calls handled for UK or EU clients follow the GDPR. Article 28(3)(a) of the UK GDPR limits a processor to the controller's documented instructions, and health, religion and other special category details that callers disclose fall under Article 9, so exclude those calls or redact them by queue.
How does selling call center data work with Sell My Data To AI?
Selling call center data with Sell My Data To AI starts with a consultation about your platforms, queues, languages and client contracts. We work out which data you own, which needs client agreement and which must be excluded, before anyone else is involved.
We then run our eight vetting checks, including a re-identification test on a sample, and share a redacted sample only with buyers you approve. Book a free consultation to start.
Frequently asked questions
Can a BPO sell recordings of calls it handled for clients?
Are transcripts easier to sell than audio?
Do all-party consent states change what we can sell?
What if card numbers were read out on recorded calls?
How large does a call center need to be?
Sources
- How to sell your company's data to AI companies, ddiy.co (figures taken from each buyer's own site), accessed November 2026
- California Penal Code section 632: eavesdropping on or recording confidential communications, California Legislative Information, accessed November 2026
- 18 U.S. Code section 2511: interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications, Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School, accessed November 2026
- California Civil Code section 1798.140: definitions (CCPA), California Legislative Information, accessed November 2026
- 45 CFR 164.502: uses and disclosures of protected health information, general rules, Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School, accessed November 2026
- AI (and other) companies: quietly changing your terms of service could be unfair or deceptive, Federal Trade Commission, accessed November 2026
- Are audio/voice recordings permitted to contain sensitive authentication data? (FAQ 1210), PCI Security Standards Council, accessed November 2026
- Biometric Information Privacy Act (740 ILCS 14), Illinois General Assembly, accessed November 2026
- UK GDPR, Article 28: processor, legislation.gov.uk, accessed November 2026
- UK GDPR, Article 9: processing of special categories of personal data, legislation.gov.uk, accessed November 2026
- Selling company data for AI training: what to know before you say yes, Frankfurt Kurnit Klein and Selz, accessed November 2026
Book a free consultation for your firm
Tell us what you hold and when suits you. In 30 minutes we cover likely buyer interest, a realistic range and any rights issues to clear first. No records leave your systems.
Related guides
- How to license video and audio archives for AI training
Data types
- De-identification for AI training data
Legal and compliance
- CCPA, state privacy laws and GDPR when selling data for AI
Legal and compliance
- Can you legally sell company data for AI training?
Legal and compliance
- How much is your data worth to AI companies?
Pricing and value
- Is selling company data to AI safe? The real risks
Legal and compliance