Skip to content
Sell My Data To AI

Selling data

How to sell meeting recordings and transcripts for AI training

By Gareth HoyleLast updated 5 minute readHow we research

In short

You can license meeting recordings and transcripts to AI companies only where each recording was lawful and your notices allow the reuse. Polyshares lists call recordings, and Labelbox Prism requires explicit, timestamped consent for likeness and voice data. No buyer publishes a price for meeting recordings. Transcripts are easier to clear than audio or video, and all-party consent states such as California set the bar.

Key takeaways

  • No buyer publishes a price for meeting recordings or transcripts, so ask buyers to price transcripts and audio separately.
  • Federal law allows recording with one party's consent, but California, Florida and Washington require the consent of all parties.
  • Lawful recording is not the same as permission to license, and the notice participants saw decides what you can reuse.
  • Labelbox Prism requires explicit, timestamped consent for likeness and voice data, and Illinois' BIPA treats a voiceprint as a biometric identifier.
  • Teams saves recordings to the organizer's OneDrive or the channel's SharePoint site, and Zoom cloud recordings can be downloaded with chat and audio files.

Meetings are where many decisions are made out loud: design reviews, incident calls, planning sessions and client check-ins. A transcript with speaker labels, the agenda and the follow-up tickets shows how a team reasoned its way to a decision, which text archives often miss. The same recordings carry the voices and faces of everyone in the room, so the rights work is heavier than for chat.

Who buys meeting recordings and transcripts?

Meeting recordings and transcripts are bought by direct buyers and training-data companies as part of operational archives, and by speech and media data platforms for audio and video.

Buyers relevant to meeting data, checked November 2026
BuyerWhat it listsWhat it requires or publishes
PolysharesCall recordings in the operational recordTypical deals $100,000 to $2 million and above
Labelbox PrismConsented likeness and voice among categories with buyer interestExplicit, timestamped consent for likeness and voice
MercorMicrosoft Teams among more than 100 supported toolsMasks more than 60 categories of sensitive identifiers
ProtegeAudio and speech, and video dataPayouts and terms not published
Defined.aiSpeech, video and multimodal datasets from partnersPartners pass ethical vetting, and 30% are approved

See our profiles of Protege and Defined.ai for the speech and media side of the market.

How much are meeting recordings worth?

Meeting recordings have no published price from any buyer we have checked. The nearest published figures cover other recorded speech and video.

  • Mercor's listing puts call centers at $20,000 to $250,000 for recorded customer conversations from operations with 50 to 5,000 agents, as reported by ddiy.co in October 2026
  • Bloomberg reported in April 2024 that Adobe paid an average of about $2.62 per minute for commissioned video of people doing everyday actions, a different kind of footage from meetings

Because no benchmark exists, ask each buyer to price transcripts and audio or video separately. Transcripts are often the part a buyer wants and the part you can clear.

What makes meeting data more valuable?

Meeting data is more valuable when transcripts are accurate and linked to the documents and actions that came out of each meeting.

What raises and lowers the value of meeting data
FactorWorth moreWorth less
TranscriptSpeaker-labeled, time-aligned and checked by a personRaw machine captions
Meeting typeDesign reviews, incident calls and planning sessionsAll-hands and social calls
Linked recordsAgenda, shared documents and follow-up ticketsRecording only
ConsentNotice or consent recorded for every participantNo record of what participants were told
AudioClear audio, ideally one track per speakerNoisy room microphones

Licensing a meeting recording depends first on whether the recording was lawful where each participant sat, and US recording law varies by state.

US recording consent rules, checked November 2026
LawWhat it says
Federal Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.C. 2511(2)(d)Recording is lawful where the recorder is a party or one party consents, unless for a criminal or tortious purpose
California Penal Code section 632Recording a confidential communication needs the consent of all parties, with fines up to $2,500 per violation for a first offense
Florida Statutes section 934.03(2)(d)Interception is lawful when all parties have given prior consent
Washington RCW 9.73.030Needs the consent of all participants, but a recorded announcement that the call is being recorded counts as consent

A lawful recording is not permission to license it. Frankfurt Kurnit Klein and Selz notes that companies must comply with the privacy statements in effect when data was collected, and lists call-recording consent laws and biometric laws among the rules that apply. FTC staff warned in February 2024 that quietly making data practices more permissive after the fact may be unfair or deceptive.

What about participants' voices and faces?

Participants' voices and faces raise biometric and likeness rules on top of recording law. Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act lists a voiceprint as a biometric identifier, and the statute sets liquidated damages of $1,000 for each negligent violation and $5,000 for each intentional or reckless one.

New York's Civil Rights Law section 50 makes it a misdemeanor to use a living person's name, picture or voice for advertising or trade without written consent. Whether a training license falls within that is a question for your own counsel, but it is one reason buyers such as Labelbox Prism ask for explicit, timestamped consent for voice and likeness. Exclude voice cloning and speaker identification from the license unless participants agreed to them.

How do you export Zoom and Teams recordings?

You export Zoom and Teams recordings from wherever each platform stores them, and the location decides who in your company can collect them.

Where meeting recordings are stored, per Microsoft and Zoom documentation
PlatformWhere recordings are savedWhat is captured
Teams meetings and eventsThe organizer's OneDrive Recordings folderRecording, with transcript and captions if transcription was on
Teams channel meetingsThe team's SharePoint site, in a Recordings folderRecording, with transcript if transcription was on
Zoom cloud recordingThe Zoom cloud, downloadable to a computerVideo, audio and chat text, plus audio-only files and a chat transcript

Microsoft notes that retention policies can delete recordings together with their transcripts, so check what still exists before you promise a buyer a date range. Collect transcripts, calendar metadata and linked documents alongside the media.

How do you de-identify meeting transcripts?

De-identifying meeting transcripts means replacing speaker labels and then finding the names, clients and figures spoken aloud.

  • Replace speaker names with roles or stable pseudonyms
  • Redact names, clients, phone numbers and account details spoken in the meeting
  • Remove chat messages and links shared during the call
  • Leave out screen-share video, which can show documents, inboxes and dashboards
  • Mute or tone out redacted audio, and blur or drop video of faces

Many sellers license transcripts only, which removes the voice and face questions entirely. Our page on speech and audio data shows what buyers expect when audio is included, and the guide to licensing video and audio archives covers media rights in depth.

If you hold UK or EU data

Recordings of people in the UK or EU are personal data. The ICO says images used to uniquely identify a person are biometric data, a special category, and under UK GDPR any biometric data processed to uniquely identify someone, such as a voiceprint, is special category data. You need a lawful basis for the reuse, or full anonymization of transcripts.

How do you start selling meeting data?

You start by listing recordings by year and meeting type, the recording notice participants saw and where external participants joined from. That shows quickly which meetings can be cleared and which must stay out.

Our seller vetting covers the privacy notice in force when data was collected and a re-identification test on a sample. Book a free consultation to find out whether buyers would want your recordings or transcripts.

Frequently asked questions

Is a meeting transcript easier to sell than the recording?
A meeting transcript is usually easier to sell than the recording, because names and figures can be redacted and checked in text, and a transcript carries no voice or face. Recordings raise biometric and likeness rules, such as Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act. Buyers training speech models still want audio, so ask each buyer to price both.
Does a recording notice at the start of a meeting cover AI training?
A recording notice shows participants knew the meeting was recorded, which matters in all-party consent states such as Washington, where a recorded announcement counts as consent. It does not by itself permit licensing to another company. What participants were told about later uses decides that, so read the notice and your privacy policy, and take advice.
Can I include meetings with clients or outside companies?
Meetings with clients or outside companies are usually excluded, because their participants never agreed to your later uses and the content is often confidential under an NDA or services contract. If a client agrees in writing, include the meeting after redacting names and figures. Internal meetings between your own staff are the easier place to start.
What if some participants joined from California?
California Penal Code section 632 makes it an offense to record a confidential communication without the consent of all parties, with fines up to $2,500 per violation for a first offense. If any participant joined from California or another all-party consent state without notice, leave that recording out and take independent legal advice.

Sources

  1. Polyshares homepage, Polyshares, accessed November 2026
  2. Prism, Labelbox, accessed November 2026
  3. Data monetization, Mercor, accessed November 2026
  4. How to sell company data to AI companies (2026 guide), ddiy.co, accessed November 2026
  5. Adobe is buying videos for $3 per minute to build AI model, Bloomberg via BNN Bloomberg, accessed November 2026
  6. 18 U.S. Code section 2511, Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School, accessed November 2026
  7. California Penal Code section 632, Justia, accessed November 2026
  8. Florida Statutes section 934.03, Florida Legislature, accessed November 2026
  9. RCW 9.73.030: intercepting, recording, or divulging private communication, Washington State Legislature, accessed November 2026
  10. Selling company data for AI training: what to know before you say yes, Frankfurt Kurnit Klein and Selz, accessed November 2026
  11. AI (and other) companies: quietly changing your terms of service could be unfair or deceptive, Federal Trade Commission, accessed November 2026
  12. Biometric Information Privacy Act, 740 ILCS 14/10 definitions, Illinois General Assembly, accessed November 2026
  13. Biometric Information Privacy Act (740 ILCS 14), Illinois General Assembly, accessed November 2026
  14. New York Civil Rights Law section 50: right of privacy, New York State Senate, accessed November 2026
  15. Use OneDrive and SharePoint for meeting recordings, Microsoft Learn, accessed November 2026
  16. Enabling and starting cloud recordings, Zoom Support, accessed November 2026
  17. What is special category data?, Information Commissioner's Office, accessed November 2026

For data owners

Talk your situation through with us

Every archive has its own rights questions. In a free consultation we look at what you hold, which buyers fit, and what would need clearing before a sale.

Related guides